Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 23.06.2025 07:30

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Who is Biden’s mom?

What’s next?

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Nothing Phone (3) spec-leak reveals 16 GB RAM and 512 GB storage, hinting at AI-powerhouse - Yanko Design

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Thank you.

What is your analysis of Walter White from Breaking Bad?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Physicists observe a new form of magnetism for the first time - Phys.org

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Russia can stop this any time.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Mark Hamill Say Carrie Fisher Told Him to Embrace His Star Wars Fame - Variety

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

What is the problem between Turkey and Greece?

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Just in the last 5 years:

What do you think about a sister's love?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

The Fastest Spinning Black Hole Ever Discovered Is Unleashing Chaos at the Speed of Light! - The Daily Galaxy

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Is GATE tougher than JEE?